Private Colleger of transportation
image
Начало Форум-основен Форум-Модел Криле Океан Океан Dreams Оръжие Криле Ретросалон Нато и България Галерия Новини Поръчай онлайн
Пентагонът потвърди смъртта на сина на Осама бин Ладен · Иран мисли да освободи танкера "Стена Имперо" · Две турски военни колони са пресекли границата и са се отправили към Идлиб · Зловещи подробности за мъжа, убит в леглото до любовницата си · Борис Джонсън ще е една от звездите на предстоящата среща на Г-7 · Зеленски зове Канада да не допуска Русия обратно в Г-8 ·

Select Forum Language:

 
Hot topics:
В момента е: Пет 23 Авг 2019, 08:29
Часовете са според зоната UTC + 2
 Главната страница » krile.net - ПЪРВИЯТ БЪЛГАРСКИ ВОЕНЕН АВИАЦИОНЕН ФОРУМ » Военна авиация - ПО СВЕТА
SR-71
Създайте нова тема   Напишете отговор Предишната тема :: Следващата тема
Страница 2 от 2 [27 Мнения]   Иди на страница: Предишна 1, 2
Автор Съобщение
su27
[Moderator]


Регистриран на: 01 Яну 2004
Мнения: 1248

МнениеПуснато на: Вто 20 Дек 2005, 13:11    Заглавие:  

Цитат:
From an article in a swedish defence magazine.

The article presents an interview with the former Viggen division leader, Per-Olof Eldh. The article is about near encounters with the SR-71 Blackbird near swedish airspace. He recalls one time as they where practicing airdefense over Gotland (an island outside the eastcoast of Sweden) but suddenly where interupted by the command central to intercept a target moving towards them, coming from the near costal area south of Stockholm. Per-Olof was guided to an direct attack at a target flying at 21500 meters (about 65 000 feet). His radar locked on at maximum distance,and the primary weapon selected was the Rb 71 Skyflash, and by the numbers presented to him he knew that it could only be a Mig 25 or the SR-71. As the contact came closer he could eventually see the gray siluette of an SR-71 passing a couple of 1000 meters above. Per-Olofs altitude is claimed to still be classified. But he says that he was higher then he had ever been before, and the sky turned black instead of the usual blueish colour. Since that day they had several contacts with the SR-71. They often flew very close to swedish airspace. coming from the east just south of Åland at mach 3, decreasing speed to mach 2.56 to make the turn and head south along the swedish coast, accelerating between the islands Gotland and Öland. Per-olof says that he made 5 encounters during his time as an active pilot.

The usual way to make an intercept was to climb up to 8000 meter, turn around and head north back towards Stockholm, accelerating to maximum speed and altitude. The later evaluations told them that they would have succeded in shooting down the aircraft if they had used their missiles.
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение 
su27
[Moderator]


Регистриран на: 01 Яну 2004
Мнения: 1248

МнениеПуснато на: Вто 20 Дек 2005, 13:34    Заглавие:  

Цитат:
Apparently, SR-71s from Mildenhall cruised up
the Baltic and back at frequent intervals. A couple of Swedish pilots decided to have a bit of fun.
So the next time an SR-71 went by, they scrambled with drop-tanks fitted.
One went north to act as the spotter, the other stooged around further
south. When the SR-71 came within radar range of the northern fighter, he
radioed the southern one. That one dropped the external tanks (breaking
peace-time regulations in the process!), turned on full afterburner and
stood the 'plane on its tail. As he reached maximum altitude, he turned on
his radar in targeting mode. He just managed to achieve lock-on before the
SR-71 ECM lit up and totally scrambled his radar picture. The two pilots
then turned for home, where the southern one just managed to land before
running out of fuel. They were apparently subsequently sent a trophy from
the SR-71 detachment, as an award for being the only people ever to have
intercepted an SR-71.
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение 
SB1


Регистриран на: 24 Юни 2005
Мнения: 204
Местожителство: Без авиация - няма нация!

МнениеПуснато на: Нед 24 Сеп 2006, 22:31    Заглавие:  

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Lockheed_SR-71A_3view.png
_________________
SR-71. This is what a plane's supposed to be.
It is ugly on the ground, leaks like a sieve, but up around Mach 1 ... the seals all expand, she dries up, flies like a bat out of hell. She's only happy... going fast. It's not meant to sit.

Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Посетете сайта на потребителя 
sweet LU

Регистриран на: 11 Дек 2006
Мнения: 8
Местожителство: tulsa,oklahoma

МнениеПуснато на: Пон 12 Фев 2007, 15:05    Заглавие:  

Привет на вси4ки!!!
Дано това Ви се понрави,както на мен!!!Позабавлявайте се!!!


If you have no desire to know anything about airplanes, please do not waste your time.

If you like planes - take a peek.

If you like fast, the key word here is FAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, planes, then read immediately.

This is right up there with, but certainly better than, “Two Bags Full”.



> There were a lot of things we could't do in an SR-71 (is this a clue to FAST??), but we were the
> fastest guys on the block and loved reminding our fellow aviators of this
> fact. People often asked us if, because of this fact, it was fun to fly
> the
> jet. Fun would not be the first word I would use to describe flying this
> plane. Intense, maybe. Even cerebral. But there was one day in our Sled
> experience when we would have to say that it was pure fun to be the
> fastest
> guys out there, at least for a moment. It occurred when Walt and I were
> flying our final training sortie. We needed 100 hours in the jet to
> complete our training and attain Mission Ready status. Somewhere over
> Colorado we had passed the century mark. We had made the turn in Arizona
> and the jet was performing flawlessly. My gauges were wired in the front
> seat and we were starting to feel pretty good about ourselves, not only
> because we would soon be flying real missions but because we had gained a
> great deal of confidence in the plan in the past ten months. Ripping
> across
> the barren deserts 80,000 feet below us, I could already see the coast of
> California from the Arizona border. I was, finally, after many humbling
> months of simulators and study, ahead of the jet. I was beginning to feel
> a
> bit sorry for Walter in the back seat. There he was, with no really good
> view of the incredible sights before us, tasked with monitoring four
> different radios. This was good practice for him for when we began flying
> real missions, when a priority transmission from headquarters could be
> vital. It had been difficult, too, for me to relinquish control of the
> radios, as during my entire flying career I had controlled my own
> transmissions. But it was part of the division of duties in this plane and
> I had adjusted to it. I still insisted on talking on the radio while we
> were on the ground, however. Walt was so good at many things, but he
> couldn't match my expertise at sounding smooth on the radios, a skill that
> had been honed sharply with years in fighter squadrons where the slightest
> radio miscue was grounds for beheading. He understood that and allowed me
> that luxury. Just to get a sense of what Walt had to contend with, I
> pulled
> the radio toggle switches and monitored the frequencies along with him.
> The
> predominant radio chatter was from Los Angeles Center , far below us,
> controlling daily traffic in their sector. While they had us on their
> scope
> (albeit briefly), we were in uncontrolled airspace and normally would not
> talk to them unless we needed to descend into their airspace.
>
> We listened as the shaky voice of a lone Cessna pilot asked Center for a
> readout of his ground speed. Center replied:
>
> "November Charlie 175, I'm showing you at ninety knots on the ground."
>
> Now the thing to understand about Center controllers, was that whether
> they
> were talking to a rookie pilot in a Cessna, or to Air Force One, they
> always spoke in the exact same, calm, deep, professional, tone that made
> one feel important. I referred to it as the " HoustonCentervoice." I have
> always felt that after years of seeing documentaries on this country's
> space program and listening to the calm and distinct voice of the
> Houstoncontrollers, that all other controllers since then wanted to sound
> like that... and that they basically did. And it didn't matter what sector
> of the country we would be flying in, it always seemed like the same guy
> was talking. Over the years that tone of voice had become somewhat of a
> comforting sound to pilots everywhere. Conversely, over the years, pilots
> always wanted to ensure that, when transmitting, they sounded like Chuck
> Yeager, or at least like John Wayne. Better to die than sound bad on the
> radios.
>
> Just moments after the Cessna's inquiry, a Twin Beech piped up on
> frequency, in a rather superior tone, asking for his groundspeed.
>
> "Ah, Twin Beach. I have you at one hundred and twenty-five knots of ground
> speed."
>
> Boy, I thought, the Beechcraft really must think he is dazzling his Cessna
> brethren.
>
> Then out of the blue, a navy F-18 pilot out of NAS Lemoore came up on
> frequency. You knew right away it was a Navy jock because he sounded very
> cool on the radios.
>
> "Center, Dusty 52 ground speed check."
>
> Before Center could reply, I'm thinking to myself, hey, Dusty 52 has a
> ground speed indicator in that million dollar cockpit, so why is he asking
> Center for a readout? Then I got it, ol' Dusty here is making sure that
> every bug smasher from Mount Whitney to the Mojave knows what true speed
> is. He's the fastest dude in the valley today, and he just wants everyone
> to know how much fun he is having in his new Hornet.
>
> And the reply, always with that same, calm, voice, with more distinct
> alliteration than emotion:
>
> "Dusty 52, Center, we have you at 620 on the ground."
>
> And I thought to myself, is this a ripe situation, or what? As my hand
> instinctively reached for the mic button, I had to remind myself that Walt
> was in control of the radios. Still, I thought, it must be done - in mere
> seconds we'll be out of the sector and the opportunity will be lost. That
> Hornet must die, and die now.
>
> I thought about all of our Sim training and how important it was that we
> developed well as a crew and knew that to jump in on the radios now would
> destroy the integrity of all that we had worked toward becoming. I was
> torn. Somewhere, 13 miles above Arizona, there was a pilot screaming
> inside
> his space helmet.
>
> Then, I heard it. The click of the mic button from the back seat. That was
> the very moment that I knew Walter and I had become a crew. Very
> professionally, and with no emotion, Walter spoke:
>
> "Los Angeles Center, Aspen 20, can you give us a ground speed check?"
>
> There was no hesitation, and the replay came as if was an everyday
> request.
>
>
> "Aspen 20, I show you at one thousand eight hundred and forty-two knots,
> across the ground."
>
> I think it was the forty-two knots that I liked the best, so accurate and
> proud was Center to deliver that information without hesitation, and you
> just knew he was smiling. But the precise point at which I knew that Walt
> and I were going to be really good friends for a long time was when he
> keyed the mic once again to say, in his most fighter-pilot-like voice:
>
> "Ah, Center, much thanks. We're showing closer to nineteen hundred on the
> money."
>
> For a moment Walter was a god. And we finally heard a little crack in the
> armor of the HoustonCentervoice, when L.A.came back with,
>
> "Roger that Aspen. Your equipment is probably more accurate than ours.You
> boys have a good one."
>
> It all had lasted for just moments, but in that short, memorable sprint
> across the southwest, the Navy had been flamed, all mortal airplanes on
> freq were forced to bow before the King of Speed, and more importantly,
> Walter and I had crossed the threshold of being a crew. A fine day's work.
>
> We never heard another transmission on that frequency all the way to the
> coast. For just one day, it truly was fun being the fastest guys out
> there.

_________________
I s prilejanieto turpelivo na svetcite,
koito kum edinya Boga se stremyat
Az v religiya prevurnah visinite,
gde orlite daje ne letyat.
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла 
German


Регистриран на: 02 Яну 2004
Мнения: 2680
Местожителство: Шуменщайн

МнениеПуснато на: Съб 24 Мар 2007, 08:47    Заглавие:  

Който го интересува, книжка на Squadron Signal за дърпане тук:
http://www.farposst.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=4192

_________________
Сред полето цъфти малко цветенце и то се казва: Ерика.
Рояк от хиляди пчелички кръжи около Ерика,
защото нейното сърце е изпълнено със сладост,
а от пъстрото ѝ одеяние струи нежен аромат.

Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла 
SB1


Регистриран на: 24 Юни 2005
Мнения: 204
Местожителство: Без авиация - няма нация!

МнениеПуснато на: Пет 09 Ное 2007, 19:03    Заглавие:  

You've probably heard the SR-71 is a severe leaker, and I'll try to put this into perspective. Once LN2 is serviced a few hours prior to launch, the fuel system becomes pressurized, and that's when the real leaks start. Normally, about five or six steady fuel leaks (about the width of a drinking straw) show up coming from both inboard wings, falling about six feet to the ground. The entire bottom of the fuselage becomes wet, and starts dripping onto the hanger floor. Some puddling starts to accumulate on top of the inboard wings, and at times runs off the wing onto the floor. In some bad leakers, fountains can be seen spraying upward from the top of the inboard wings, ranging anywhere from two inches to three feet in height. Usually, the really bad leaks occur when the aircraft is getting close to being sent to the Depot for an overhaul. How much fuel is actually lost prior to flight? It was a common practice to refuel the aircraft about four or five hours prior to flight. It was also standard to place about four to seven hundred pounds of JP-7 extra in the tanks to allow for this leakage. That's a loss of about one hundred pounds or sixteen gallons per hour. And folks, that's just for a standard fuel load. At times, due to lack of tankers, we would put considerably more fuel onboard, and launch her on a "rocket ride". When we did this, you could basically double the amount of leaks I've described. Why all the leaks? High temperature fuel sealant was especially designed for the SR-71, and there's no other substance known in existence to replace it. Once the aircraft is as cruise speeds, it tends to seal itself. The leaks I've spoken of do not jeopardize the safety of the aircraft, due to the high flash point of JP-7. In fact, a lit match thrown into it would just go out. Up until the late 80's, the fuel leaked was simply washed out of the hanger after the launch, and went into the ground. Due to environmental laws towards the end of the program, we started to catch the fuel in drip pans, dispose of it properly, and vacuum the residual from the floor. You could always pick out the guys who had participated in a launch. They smelled like JP-7, there hair was sticky looking, and fuel stains covered their uniforms. Many guys wore rain suits to eliminate this problem. Believe it or not, a half can of Coke added to the wash removed all the stains and smells from the clothing.



Smile



http://www.blackbirds.net/u2/c_bennett/bbird-03.html

_________________
SR-71. This is what a plane's supposed to be.
It is ugly on the ground, leaks like a sieve, but up around Mach 1 ... the seals all expand, she dries up, flies like a bat out of hell. She's only happy... going fast. It's not meant to sit.

Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Посетете сайта на потребителя 
SB1


Регистриран на: 24 Юни 2005
Мнения: 204
Местожителство: Без авиация - няма нация!

МнениеПуснато на: Съб 10 Ное 2007, 16:58    Заглавие:  

http://www.milnet.com/sr-71.htm

http://www.area51zone.com/aircraft/sr71.shtml


http://www.testpilot.ru/usa/lockheed/sr/71/sr71_bye.htm


SR-71 Blackbird

Length:


107.4 ft.

Width:


55.6 ft.

Height:


l8.5 feet

Take-off Weight:


140,000 lbs.

Fuel Weight:


210,000 lbs.

Main Propulsion:


2 Pratt and Whitney J-58 axial-flow turbojets with afterburners

Take-off Thrust:


32,500 lbs. each engine (65000 lbs. total)

Maximum Speed:


Mach 3.5 (2,500 mph)

Maximum Altitude:


100,000+ ft.

Range:


2,500 miles+ without refueling; intercontinental with refueling

The SR-71 Blackbird, originally named the RS-71, but renamed when Lyndon Johnson accidentally rearranged the letters during his 1964 announcement of the existence of the SR-71 (or RS-71?). Anyway, it was designed by Clarence "Kelly" Johnson, at that time vice president of the Skunk Works. The project began in February 1963. The SR-71/RS-71 was built to be a strategic reconnaissance aircraft. Its first flight was on Dec. 22, 1964.

The SR-71/RS-71 is the "true" successor to the U-2 in every way. The SR-71 took a huge leap over the U-2 instead of just a normal small step.

As Kelly Johnson says, "It makes no sense to just take this one or two steps ahead, because we'd be buying only couple of years before the Russians would be able to nail us again. No, I want us to come up with an airplane that can rule the skies for a decade or more."

Basically, he wanted a plane that wouldn't be obsolete in a couple of seconds (sort of like computers nowdays:). So, they made the SR-71. And they succeeded in their goal. Maybe even oversucceeded. The SR-71 has a top speed of Mach 3.5 (more than 3 times the speed of sound!), can fly higher than 100,000 feet, and has a range of 4,000 miles! Unlike experimental rocket engines, the SR-71 can cruise at Mach 3, and fly from New York to Las Angles in less than an hour, on one tank of gas. It can also survey more than 100,000 square miles of the Earth's surface in one hour.

Why the SR-71 Retired and then Re-Entered Service

� Why people thought it retired

To make a long story short,
the three most commonly known reasons are:

1. The SR-71 is getting too old to maintain and/or it was too expensive
2. Satellites could do it all
3. Never stated officially, but was widely believed, was that the Blackbird was being retired because a superior replacement was entering service (Aurora?).

At least two of those reasons don't hold up:

1. Maintaining:
The Blackbird was in good shape. There were more than enough of many components (including engines) in storage to last as far out as you wanted to project. In fact, there are still hundreds of millions of dollars of parts, already paid for, in stock.

Cost: Regarding cost, the SR-71 was not cheap. The cost of running the SR-71 fleet in the 1980s was $260 million annually. ABC News has stated that the cost of a single reconnaissance satellite is about $1 billion. It isn't cheap, but it isn't too expensive. It costs $50,000 an hour to fly the SR on a routine basis.
2. It wasn't a lack of work that sent the Blackbirds into retirement, there were far more requests for SR-71 time than there were aircraft to fly the missions.
3. The Aurora? Maybe�



� Why it really retired

1. The SR-71 was assigned to SAC. SAC, though, didn't really see the plane as contributing to SAC's mission (dropping bombs) or image, and it had always been somewhat of an awkward fit. Further, unlike its various C-135 modes and the U-2, the SR-71 couldn't loiter, nor did anyone ever promise that it could (although with some of its planned upgrades it could perform more functions than it was then doing). SAC really didn't want the airplane.
2. One legitimate complaint against the aircraft:
3. The biggest users of the SR-71 were the CIA, for obvious reasons, State and the Navy. The Navy had for years operated what was essentially a Mach 2, shorter legged SR-71, the RA-5C. When it retired, the Navy suffered a severe loss of reconnaissance capability. Although the F-14 provides reconnaissance capability with its TARPS system, that system has been held back while there are repeated attempts to give the Navy's Designated Wonderplane, the F/A-18, to take over the reconnaissance mission. As a result, the Navy has been an enthusiastic proponent of the SR-71 for reconnaissance as well as defense exercises. It is quite familiar with what a rapidly responding asset like the SR-71 could do, even when you had to go very high up to get the aircraft. USAF didn't choose to use most of the kind of intelligence the SR-71 could gather. However, funding for the SR-71 came out of USAF's budget, where it competed with other programs USAF wanted more. There had been proposals to treat the SR -71as a national asset and fund it accordingly, but these moves were blocked at various levels. There was also limited talk of the USN funding the program, but this also went nowhere. If you're the Navy are you going to fund an aircraft that isn't yours? If you're USAF, you may not want the plane, but there's no way you're going to let anyone paint "Navy" on the side of the fastest airplane in the world.� The SR-71 also was not liked by many of the "overhead" or satellite people at the NRO and elsewhere who thought satellites were the best for everything. They considered the SR-71 to be a competitive, rather than complementary system. By their very nature, satellite successes (and failures) tended to be very hush-hush and here was the SR-71 getting the "glory". Further there was the oft stated opinion by many that satellites could do anything needed better than anything else. While they are marvelous devices, this has never been true. The SR-71 flying around tended to gainsay the omnipotent image of satellites.
4. In the 1980s, opposition to the SR operations got stronger in a number of areas. Already planned sensor and maintainability upgrades were cancelled, and then because the SR couldn't perform the function an upgrade was supposed to do, this was given as a reason why the SR wasn't capable enough. Personnel rotation policies also were used against the SR. Because of its unique nature, the SR required service personnel that had a higher level of experience than other aircraft. USAF recognized this for many years and didn't rotate support personnel as often. In the 1980s, this policy changed and maintenance personnel went on the normal USAF rotation, lowering the experience level and increasing the mmh/fh ratio, which was then trumpeted as "proof" that the SR was becoming less maintainable. There were also options explored to further reduce the annual cost of the SR fleet, down to around $150 million annually. These would have involved greater use of contractor personnel, feasible on such a specialized, limited quantity aircraft, but were turned down as was the plan to permanently base (instead of operating as a Detachment) two SR-71s in England.
5. Then a T-39 crashed in April, 1985. General Jerry O' Malley was aboard, on his way to an official speaking engagement. He understood the nature of the SR-71 and its unique requirements and benefits. He was likely to become the Air Force Chief of Staff in 1986, and possibly even Chairman of the Joint Chiefs after that. When he was killed, General Welch went on to become chairman, and he was known as being hostile to the SR-71. This was when the SR-71's fate was sealed, although it took three more years to die.
6. The actual retirement of the SR-71 demonstrated its unpopularity with some at the top. Usually, when a major aircraft goes out of service, there are very high ranking officials present and numerous tributes are offered to the aircraft. At the retirement of the SR-71, many observers noted the absence of the usual highest rank of military and government officials at the ceremony. It's well known that the SR-71 delivered to the Smithsonian established new speed records, as the Smithsonian requested. What isn't well known is that the Air Force initially refused the request for a record flight, and in fact kept trying to block it up until the last minute. It took the personal intervention of Sen. John Glenn to permit the record flight to take place. Even then, the crew was instructed to fly a conservative by-the-book profile, which was unnecessary considering that this was to be the aircraft's last flight ever. After the arrival of 17972 at Dulles, USAF made no effort to help the Smithsonian in its preservation and it was left to deteriorate in the D.C. weather. The bird is now in a climate-controlled hangar, but that hangar was donated by the hangar manufacturer. One would expect that USAF would have pushed the PR value of this flight for all it was worth, but if you review the publicity of the time, you'll find it didn't come from there.

� Why it was re-activated

1. Blackbird supporters said this all was a big mistake, but really no one listened to them
2. Less than a year after the record flight it became apparent that it was a big mistake. When Desert Shield began, Gen. Schwarzkopf was reported to have asked for the SR-71 very early on. It is known that very soon after Saddam moved into Kuwait, USAF approached Lockheed and asked how long it would take to restore SR-71 operations. Lockheed's response was that depending on the priority and if USAF could supply the sensor packages (USAF had them and even Lockheed didn't know where they were), the first one could be operational in 14 days and the next one around thirty days after that (remember, they hadn't been out of service that long at this point). There was no response for a number of weeks and then Lockheed was directed to forget the whole thing.
3. The SR would have had a major impact in the war. Basically, it could have done a lot better at tracking the ever-moving Scuds than sattelites would have. As it is, the best locating of Scuds was not done by airborne intel, but by special ops forces placed in Iraq. Stupid!
4. The people on top have left, and the ones that are there wouldn't be embarrased by the return of the SR-71.
5. The congress is funding it separately, so it doesn't compete with other projects.
6. Plus, the SR-71 fleet (what's left of it) is cheap. The planes are bought and paid for. There are lots of spare parts.
7. There are still people who know how to fly it.
8. The contractor is not getting filthy rich reactivating them. Only $72.5 million would cover it, and Lockheed ended up giving a good portion of that back.

So, there it is, a basic view of why the SR-71 retired and then was re-activated.











Click to see if image is larger


Click to see if image is larger


Click to see if image is larger

_________________
SR-71. This is what a plane's supposed to be.
It is ugly on the ground, leaks like a sieve, but up around Mach 1 ... the seals all expand, she dries up, flies like a bat out of hell. She's only happy... going fast. It's not meant to sit.

Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Посетете сайта на потребителя 
Erich_Hartmann

Регистриран на: 06 Фев 2009
Мнения: 6

МнениеПуснато на: Нед 05 Апр 2009, 14:16    Заглавие: Легенди за вироглавите "Черни птици" (SR-71)!  

Ще помоля темата да не се замърсява с подобни глупости!

onufrii
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла 
Sea Dog
[Moderator]


Регистриран на: 10 Дек 2005
Мнения: 3529
Местожителство: Варна

МнениеПуснато на: Вто 03 Ное 2009, 12:59    Заглавие:  

Click to see if image is larger

Click to see if image is larger

_________________
Снимки - http://niki-zlatev.blogspot.com/
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла Посетете сайта на потребителя 
Preslav
[Admin]


Регистриран на: 19 Яну 2006
Мнения: 42470

МнениеПуснато на: Нед 03 Ное 2013, 17:42    Заглавие:  

Lockheed Martin разкри наследника на SR-71
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла Посетете сайта на потребителя 
Preslav
[Admin]


Регистриран на: 19 Яну 2006
Мнения: 42470

МнениеПуснато на: Сря 13 Ное 2013, 17:34    Заглавие:  

Разработват безпилотен, хиперзвуков самолет
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение Изпрати мейла Посетете сайта на потребителя 
Fuzzy_Logic

Регистриран на: 08 Юли 2006
Мнения: 1493

МнениеПуснато на: Съб 01 Дек 2018, 14:36    Заглавие:  

На днях четверо военнослужащих шведских ВВС получили американские награды за выполненную ими во времена Холодной войны миссию, которая была признана только в прошлом году. В 1987 году они помогли разведывательному самолету SR-71 Blackbird («Чёрный дрозд») уйти от возможного преследования советских самолётов, проследовав через воздушное пространство Швеции. Об этом сообщает американское издание WarZone.

Полковник ВВС Швеции Ларс-Эрик Блад, майор Роджер Моллер, майор Кристер Сьоберг и лейтенант Бо Игнолл получили "воздушные" медали (Air Medal) во время церемонии в посольстве США в Стокгольме 28 ноября 2018 года. Ими награждаются лётчики за особый героизм или другие особые заслуги. Также присутствовали подполковники ВВС США Дуэйн Нолл и Том Вельтри – пилоты SR-71 Blackbird.
ВВС США не потеряли незаменимый самолет, а жизни двух членов экипажа были спасены.

- заявил Нолл в ходе церемонии.

29 июня 1987 года Нолл и Вельтри вылетели с британской авиабазы Mildenhall в направлении Баренцева и Балтийского морей. В их задачу входило, пребывая в международном воздушном пространстве, получение с большой высоты снимков объектов на территории СССР (находящихся, в частности, на Кольском полуострове и на побережье Балтики). Во время выполнения миссии «Балтийский экспресс» неожиданно вышел из строя один из двигателей SR-71. Самолет снизился на более чем 24 000 футов за считанные минуты и оказался в воздушном пространстве Швеции.



СССР уже давно дал понять, что намерен сбивать американские разведчики в случае нарушения границ страны, что подтверждало уничтожение U-2 в 1960 году, который тоже пытался уйти от преследования. Не особо церемонились советские истребители и в международном пространстве, что, как полагает издание, продолжает делать современная Россия. При этом в узких границах балтийского региона имелся риск недолгого пребывания SR-71 на территории СССР в ходе своего падения, в связи с чем советские истребители могли уничтожить самолет.

Мы не знали, кто нас найдёт первым.


- заявил Велтри, добавив, что он и Нолл были обеспокоены возможностью начала «русской охоты».

Поэтому они были в восторге, когда увидели шведские Saab Viggen и были уверены, что с этого момента советские самолеты будут держаться на дистанции. Швеция не была (и до сих пор не является) членом НАТО, но исторически оказалась более близкой к альянсу. Во время Холодной войны шведские военные активно патрулировали границы своей страны для пресечения вторжения с обеих сторон.

Мы выполняли обычную операцию в мирное время. Наш оператор спросил: «Можете ли вы перехватить и идентифицировать цель?». Я сразу подумал, что это SR-71.

- пояснил Моллер.

Американский разведчик в это время выдал код «7700», что указывало на чрезвычайную ситуацию на самолете. Сопровождаемый истребителями, SR-71 вышел из шведского воздушного пространства на одном двигателе. После этого он проследовал через Данию в Западную Германию, где совершил аварийную посадку на базе Нордхольц.


После инцидента Стокгольм согласился не придавать его огласке, как и другие миссии Blackbird, в связи с чем информация о нём была засекречена. Об этом стало известно лишь в 2017 году, спустя 30 лет, что позволило выразить публичную признательность шведским пилотам.

Этот день в 1987 году показал нам, что мы всегда можем рассчитывать на наших шведских партнеров во время большой опасности.
,
- заявил генерал-майор ВВС США Джон Уильямс.
Click to see if image is larger
Върнете се в началото
Вижте профила на потребителя Изпратете лично съобщение 
Покажи мнения от преди:   Сортирай по:   
Страница 2 от 2 [27 Мнения]   Иди на страница: Предишна 1, 2
Създайте нова тема   Напишете отговор Предишната тема :: Следващата тема
 Главната страница » krile.net - ПЪРВИЯТ БЪЛГАРСКИ ВОЕНЕН АВИАЦИОНЕН ФОРУМ » Военна авиация - ПО СВЕТА
Идете на:  

Не Можете да пускате нови теми
Не Можете да отговаряте на темите
Не Можете да променяте съобщенията си
Не Можете да изтривате съобщенията си
Не Можете да гласувате в анкети

[ Time: 0.0793s ][ Queries: 13 (0.0056s) ][ Debug on ]

 
Copyright ©2006-2012 Air Group 2000 Ltd. All rights reserved. support@airgroup2000.com

eXTReMe Tracker